Moscow Demands Staggering Amount in Damages against Clearing House over Seized Assets

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is pursuing damages totaling $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin against plans to utilize immobilized Russian state assets to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

According to reports in Russian news outlets, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

EU leaders will decide in the coming days on a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU officials have argued that their plan is legally sound. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU countries shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any use of the funds as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, including confiscating European private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a key role in diplomatic talks, wrote on X that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a severe attack on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials said they are developing steps to deter other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against European companies. They are also designing safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be obligated to return the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the ongoing war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that when you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."
Glenn Morgan
Glenn Morgan

An art historian and curator passionate about modern art movements and cultural narratives.