🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

In Europe, a growing group of nations are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' childhood". Legislation could be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to approve a proposal increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding statement supporting a ban for minors without parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these services, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a solid first step," stated the European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on robust data".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. However, the government pledged to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," said a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, legislation is mostly unfolding at the regional level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various figures to copy Australia's lead, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, additional states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, international bodies take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that governments internationally are less and less willing to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.